Donaldson v. City Of Chicago
Pedro Donaldson |
City Of Chicago, Chicago Park District, Janowski and Mehmedagic |
1:2024cv09526 |
October 4, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John F Kness |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: In-person status hearing held 11/20/2024. Plaintiff failed to appear. For the reasons stated on the record, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Because this order does not constitute a final judgment on the merits, the Court will not enter a separate final judgment order at this time. See Gleason v. Jansen, 888 F.3d 847, 852 (7th Cir. 2018) (dismissals without prejudice "are normally nonfinal for purposes of appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291."). Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (exr, ) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: An in-person hearing is set for 11/20/2024 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 2125. Plaintiff is directed to appear in person at the hearing. Mailed notice. (exr, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the reassignment of the case, the status hearing of 11/22/2024 for Judge Chang is vacated. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Case Reassigned to the Honorable John F. Kness for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 40.4. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment) (gcy, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 8, filed by the City, if the City anticipates filing a motion to reassign to the lower-numbered case, 23-cv-08001, then the City should act promptly in doing so. Separately, the Plaintiff must file a status report, by 11/08/2024, on the progress of service as to each of the Defendants. Or the Plaintiff may file a voluntary dismissal of this case, without prejudice, and simply pursue the 23-cv-08001 case. The tracking status hearing of 11/01/2024 is reset to 11/22/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Mailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 8 STATUS Report (Initial) by City Of Chicago (Mowatt, Raoul) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Raoul Vertick Mowatt (Mowatt, Raoul) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 11/01/2024 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 10/23/2024. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendants have not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (smb, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Leslie Esther Wiesen (Wiesen, Leslie) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wiesen, Leslie) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2024L009688) filed by City Of Chicago (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Wiesen, Leslie) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (bi, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (bi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.