Williams v. AFAM Concept Inc., Inc. et al
| Alma Williams |
| L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, SoftSheen-Carson, LLC, House of Cheatham, LLC., SoftSheen-Carson (W.I.), Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., AFAM Concept Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., House of Cheatham, Inc. and Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC |
| 1:2024cv09579 |
| October 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:24-cv-09579 Williams v. AFAM Concept Inc., et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060). (rc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (vjd, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Alma Williams by Navan Ward, Jr (Ward, Navan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ward, Navan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alma Williams; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22565582.(Ward, Navan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
