Johnson v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
| Jackie Johnson |
| LOREAL USA Products, Inc., HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, Namaste Laboratories LLC, Strength of Nature, LLC., Loreal USA Inc, SoftSheen- Carson LLC, AFAM Concept Inc. administrator d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Luster Products, Inc., Avlon Industries and Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC |
| 1:2024cv09616 |
| October 7, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:24-cv-09616 Johnson v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (smb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jackie Johnson by Mark Abramowitz (Abramowitz, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Abramowitz, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jackie Johnson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22567813.(Abramowitz, Mark) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (vjd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
