Greene v. Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct
| Cedric Greene |
| Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct |
| 1:2024cv09755 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CIRCUIT Rule 3(b) Fee Notice. (td, ) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis #13 is denied because this court concludes the appeal is not taken in good faith, in the sense that the appeal would be frivolous. See Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1027 (7th Cir. 2000); see also #6 (explaining why this court dismissed the complaint as legally frivolous). Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Cedric Greene for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. (Received via pro se email on 12/02/2024) (rc, ) |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of short record on appeal regarding notice of appeal #8 ; USCA Case No. 24-3118. (jcc,) |
| Filing 11 CIRCUIT Rule 3(b) Notice. (jcc, ) |
| Filing 10 TRANSMITTED to the 7th Circuit the short record on notice of appeal #8 . Notified counsel. (jcc,) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appeal Due letter sent to counsel of record regarding notice of appeal #8 . (jcc,) |
| MAILED Notice of Appeal Due Letter #9 to Cedric Greene. (jcc,) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of appeal by Cedric Greene regarding orders #6 , #7 . (Received via pro se email on 11/19/24) (jcc,) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (psm, ) |
| Filing 7 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Notices Mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The application to proceed without prepayment of fees #4 is denied, because plaintiff's complaint is legally frivolous in this district. The complaint is dismissed. Cedric Greene, a Los Angeles, California, resident, has filed or attempted to file suits against the Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the Middle District of Georgia, and now has submitted a complaint in this district. This court is not the proper venue for any claims (and this court does not have personal jurisdiction over the Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct based on its treatment of plaintiff in Tennessee). Plaintiff has a history of litigation conduct that caused other courts to impose filing restrictions on him. See e.g., In re Cedric Greene, 578 U.S. 974 (2016) ("As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1."). It looks like the filing here is an attempt to circumvent restrictions elsewhere. Plaintiff is warned that frivolous filings may lead to restrictions in this court too. In any event, the court dismisses the complaint for lack of venue and personal jurisdiction, which means the dismissal is without prejudice. Enter judgment and terminate civil case. This case is closed. Notices Mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST by Plaintiff Cedric Greene for judicial notice. (Exhibits) (Received via pro se email on 10/15/24) (jcc, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Cedric Greene for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Received via pro se email on 10/09/24.) (jxm, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Cedric Greene (Received via pro se email on 10/09/24.) (jxm, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Received via pro se email on 10/09/24.) (jxm, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Cedric Greene (Received via pro se email on 10/09/24.) (jxm, ) |
| MAILED LR 73.1 and Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction form to Cedric Greene (jxm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Greene v. Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedric Greene | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tennessee Board of Judicial Conduct | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
