Lenoir v. O'Malley
Rasha Lenoir |
Martin J. O'Malley |
1:2024cv09764 |
October 9, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jeannice W Appenteng |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Raedy, Valerie) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng: The parties have consented to proceed before Magistrate Judge Appenteng #7 . The Commissioner is ordered to file a certified copy of the administrative record by 60 days after the filing of the complaint, but the Commissioner should not submit a hard copy of the administrative record to chambers until ordered to do so. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision shall be filed on or before 12/30/2024. Plaintiff's brief must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. Failure to comply with these directives may result in waiver. The Commissioner's response brief and/or motion for summary judgment is due on or before 2/13/2025. In the argument section of its brief, the Commissioner must address each issue that plaintiff identifies in the statement of the issues in plaintiff's brief. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, must be filed on or before 2/27/2025. Mailed notice. (kl, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: CONSENT REASSIGNMENT of case to the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Mailed notice. (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment) (jj, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the joint consent #7 , this case is transferred to the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Any deadlines set before Judge Blakey are stricken. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Valerie Rebecca Raedy as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Martin J. O'Malley (Raedy, Valerie) |
Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (smb, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (smb, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Rasha Lenoir for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rasha Lenoir by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rasha Lenoir; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lenoir v. O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rasha Lenoir | |
Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley | |
Represented By: | AUSA - SSA |
Represented By: | Valerie Rebecca Raedy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.