Myers v. Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC et al
| Annieliese Myers |
| L Oreal USA, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Dabur International Ltd, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Dudley Beauty Corporation, LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc., Sally Beauty Supply, LLC, Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, Luster Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson (W.I), Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, Strength of Nature, LLC and L Oreal USA Products, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv10148 |
| October 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category Direct). (smb, ) |
| Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:24-cv-10148 Myers v. Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (nsf, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Annieliese Myers by Navan Ward, Jr (Ward, Navan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ward, Navan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Annieliese Myers; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22597728.(Ward, Navan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
