Kirkpatrick v. Revlon, Inc. et al
| Hazel Kirkpatrick |
| Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC |
| 1:2024cv10499 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hazel Kirkpatrick by Sherrell Dandy (Dandy, Sherrell) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hazel Kirkpatrick by Tobias L Millrood (Millrood, Tobias) |
| Filing 2 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:24-cv-10499 Kirkpatrick v. Revlon, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060) (evw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Hazel Kirkpatrick, Revlon Group Holdings LLC; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22611338. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Millrood, Tobias) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (men, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
