Hall v. AFAM Concept Inc.
| Virginia Hall |
| L'Oreal USA Inc., Revlon Consumer Prodcuts Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, AFAM Concept Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products Inc., Namaste Labatories, SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and Revlon, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv00526 |
| January 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virginia Hall by Tobias L Millrood (Millrood, Tobias) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Virginia Hall by Sherrell Dandy (Dandy, Sherrell) |
| Filing 2 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 25-cv-00526 Hall v. AFAM Concept Inc. / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (vjd, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Virginia Hall; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22962216. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Millrood, Tobias) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (men, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
