Pruitt v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Pruitt
Defendant: LOreal USA, Inc.,, SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature, LLC and LOreal USA Products Inc.
: Service List
Case Number: 1:2025cv02613
Filed: March 12, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mary M Rowland
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2025 Filing 4 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. (jg, )
August 1, 2025 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The Court held a hearing on 7/30/25 to consider the Defendants' request to dismiss identified individual cases based on alleged failures to comply with CMO 9 and to order certain individual cases to cure alleged substantive PFS deficiencies, including this case. For the reasons stated on the record on 7/30/25, Plaintiff's case is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute her case. Mailed notice (ags)
March 12, 2025 Filing 2 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:25-cv-02613 Pruitt v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060) (vkm, )
March 12, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michelle Pruitt; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23199536. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bruegger, John)
March 12, 2025 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (mam, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pruitt v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Pruitt
Represented By: John Anthony Bruegger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOreal USA, Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SoftSheen-Carson LLC,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Strength of Nature, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOreal USA Products Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Jake Woody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?