Clark v. Boeing Corporation, The et al
| Andrea Clark |
| Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The and ReedGroup |
| 1:2025cv10917 |
| September 10, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Laura K McNally |
| John J Tharp |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 39 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The defendant's motion #38 for an extension of time to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. The new deadline is 3/9/2026. Mailed notice (ber, ) |
| Filing 38 MOTION by Defendants Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The for extension of time to file Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings Presented before District Judge (Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 37 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Laura K. McNally. This case has been referred for discovery supervision and, if the parties are interested, settlement assistance. Per #35 , the following discovery schedule shall apply: Initial disclosures due 2/25/26. Close of fact discovery 12/18/26. Close of expert discovery 1/18/27. An updated joint status report shall be filed 4/29/26. Mailed notice (sxw) |
| Filing 36 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Laura K. McNally for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: all further discovery scheduling and supervision as well as any settlement conference the parties may jointly seek. All protective orders and confidentiality orders are included within this referral. (ber, ) Mailed notice |
| Filing 35 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Upon review of the parties' joint status report #34 , the Court adopts the parties' proposed case management schedule. The matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for all further discovery scheduling and supervision as well as any settlement conference the parties may jointly seek. All protective orders and confidentiality orders are included within this referral. Mailed notice (ber, ) |
| Filing 34 STATUS Report JOINT by Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The (Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 33 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The parties are directed to review the procedures for initial status reports, located at [https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge_display.php?LastName=Tharp+Jr.], and to submit an initial status report by 1/28/2026. The report must include all information in the relevant template, including a proposed case management schedule reflecting any disputes between the parties as to the proposed schedule. Status reports missing required information will be stricken.Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 32 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Boeing Corporation, The (Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 31 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Alight Solutions LLC (Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 30 ANSWER to amended complaint by Alight Solutions LLC(Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 29 ANSWER to amended complaint by Boeing Corporation, The (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 28 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| Filing 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond through 1/14/2026 #26 is granted. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 26 MOTION by Defendants Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The for extension of time to file answer regarding amended complaint #25 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 25 Second AMENDED complaint by Andrea Clark against Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The (Ravis, Talia) |
| Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint #23 is granted without objection. The complaint should be filed on the docket as a separate entry. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 23 MOTION by Plaintiff Andrea Clark to amend/correct text entry, #22 Second Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Second Amended Complaint)(Ravis, Talia) |
| Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The plaintiff's second amended complaint #21 is stricken as improperly filed. Since the plaintiff has already amended once, she may only amend again with leave of court or opposing party consent. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 21 Second AMENDED complaint by Andrea Clark against Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The (Ravis, Talia) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The defendants' motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond #19 is granted. Responses should be filed by 1/5/2026. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Defendants Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The for extension of time to file answer regarding amended complaint #18 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 18 AMENDED complaint by Andrea Clark against Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The and terminating Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company (Ravis, Talia) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's motion for an extension #14 is granted. The defendant should file an answer or other responsive pleading by 12/15/2025. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Andrea Clark. Boeing Corporation, The waiver sent on 10/16/2025, answer due 12/15/2025. (Davis, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Andrea Clark. Alight Solutions LLC waiver sent on 10/16/2025, answer due 12/15/2025. (Davis, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Defendant Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 , waiver of service executed #10 Unopposed (Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The, Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company by Eric P. Mathisen (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The, Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company by Cristin J. Mack (Mack, Cristin) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendants Alight Solutions LLC, Boeing Corporation, The, Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(jks, ) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Andrea Clark. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company waiver sent on 9/12/2025, answer due 11/11/2025. (Davis, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Andrea Clark by Talia Betty Ravis, 1st (Ravis, Talia) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Attorney Talia Ravis's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #4 is granted. Counsel is directed to file an appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Andrea Clark by Talia Betty Ravis, 1st; Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-24072147. (Ravis, Talia) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Andrea Clark by Matthew Richard Davis (Davis, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Davis, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Andrea Clark; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24043546.(Davis, Matthew) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (gmc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gmc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.