Johnson v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
| Debra Johnson |
| Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham, LLC., L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC., Luster Products, Namaste Laboratories, Strength of Nature, LLC and Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. |
| Service List |
| 1:2025cv13025 |
| October 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (mam, ) |
| Filing 4 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 25-cv-13025 Johnson v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (vjd, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Debra Johnson by Edward A. Wallace (Wallace, Edward) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Debra Johnson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24251293.(Wallace, Edward) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wallace, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
