Lauren Maree Edmonds v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| Lauren Maree Edmonds |
| The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, baocui, jikonghuifu, shenzhenfengyushangmao, zhoukouluanxinbaihuoyouxiangongsi, guangzhouliuxiaomingmaoyi, Xingyaodi auto parts, shijiamodianzishangwu, shanxifudianxintongkejiyouxiangongsi, Juyuan Automobile Sales, shenzhenshitangjiajiamaoyi, nanyangshiwanchengqufenglishangmaoyouxiangongsi, ShanDongZhiYeJianZhuZhuangShiGongChengYouXianGongSi, fuyangtengchangzaishengziyuanyouxiangongsi, wuyangxiandingshengjiajuyouxiangongsi, luohuimukaifushi, guangzhouchangxiang, MA8GT8153Q, HongDongXianMoKaiShangMaoYouXianGongSi, zaoyangshiyifeifanbianlidian, AZCJC, guizhouminghuinongyeyouxiangongsi, yidushiwajiushangmaodian, nanyangshilongquanshangmaoyouxiangongsi, gansuxinshengherunshangmaoyouxiangongsi, DYSY, ApricotTree, Wishing FAST, shijiazhuangqucaimaoyiyouxiangongsi, ZhuZhouBinYiShangMaoYouXianGongSi, SUSTA, ZhuShanXianXiongDiYuanSongShiZhuBaoZhongXin, lingqiuxianchunhenongyejixieyouxiangongsi, SUP-SKDW, GH-GSY, CooL Z, hoanguyentn2203, ChenKaiMaoYi, Broad Universe, WEN QEE, jiaguozheng, xxufjh, WannaSong, MAOLI HOME, KONGHUI STORE, Defendant 6, Defendant 15, Defendant 17, Defendant 22, Defendant 27 and Defendant 29 |
| 1:2025cv14539 |
| December 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey I Cummings |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 43 MEMORANDUM by Lauren Maree Edmonds in support of motion for default judgment #42 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 42 MOTION by Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds for default judgment as to Renewed Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment against the Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 41 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lauren Maree Edmonds as to Certain Defendants identified on Schedule A (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 40 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment #33 is denied without prejudice in light of the Seventh Circuit's opinion in Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, --- F.4th ----, 2026 WL 880018 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). In Liu, the Court vacated the district court's entry of default judgment because the "evidence upon which the district court relied for establishing personal jurisdiction showed only that it was possible to order the defendants' products and have them shipped to Illinois, not that such sales took place." Id. at *2. Specifically, the evidence in Liu consisted "of screenshots of [defendant seller's] website showing the checkout page with the infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total, but not a completed purchase." Id. Relying on NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 620 (7th Cir. 2022) and Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020), the Seventh Circuit explained that such evidence was insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. Here, plaintiff has submitted the same type of evidence to establish personal jurisdiction, i.e., screenshots of defendants' websites showing the checkout pages, but no evidence of completed purchases. (Dckt. #19-1). Accordingly, on the instant record, the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over defendants sufficient to enter default judgment. See 360 Insight v. The Spamhaus Project, 500 F.3d 594, 598 (7th Cir. 2007) ("Default judgments rendered without personal jurisdiction are void... "). Plaintiff may file a renewed motion for default judgment establishing a basis for personal jurisdiction over each defendant. Any such motion shall be filed by 4/29/26. If a renewed motion for default judgment consistent with this order and Seventh Circuit precedent is not filed by 4/29/26, this action may be dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Enduring Love Int'l Church v. Williams, No. 23-CV-1120-PP, 2024 WL 3553979, at *2 (E.D.Wis. July 26, 2024) ("Although sua sponte dismissal of claims for lack of personal jurisdiction is generally disfavored, district courts retain discretion to depart from that principle"). The previously set 3/30/26 tracking status hearing is stricken and reset to 5/29/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 39 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [certain] defendants (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 38 CERTIFICATE of Service by Keith A. Vogt on behalf of Lauren Maree Edmonds regarding text entry,,, #37 (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 37 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion #33 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 2/18/26. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. The 2/23/26 tracking status hearing is stricken and reset to 3/30/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 36 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 2/5/2026. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 35 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction #27 is granted as to the remaining defendants. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the court's docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| NEW PARTIES: baocui, jikonghuifu, shenzhenfengyushangmao, zhoukouluanxinbaihuoyouxiangongsi, guangzhouliuxiaomingmaoyi, Xingyaodi auto parts, shijiamodianzishangwu, shanxifudianxintongkejiyouxiangongsi, Juyuan Automobile Sales, shenzhenshitangjiajiamaoyi, nanyangshiwanchengqufenglishangmaoyouxiangongsi, ShanDongZhiYeJianZhuZhuangShiGongChengYouXianGongSi, fuyangtengchangzaishengziyuanyouxiangongsi, wuyangxiandingshengjiajuyouxiangongsi, luohuimukaifushi, guangzhouchangxiang, MA8GT8153Q, HongDongXianMoKaiShangMaoYouXianGongSi, zaoyangshiyifeifanbianlidian, AZCJC, guizhouminghuinongyeyouxiangongsi, yidushiwajiushangmaodian, nanyangshilongquanshangmaoyouxiangongsi, gansuxinshengherunshangmaoyouxiangongsi, DYSY, ApricotTree, Wishing FAST, shijiazhuangqucaimaoyiyouxiangongsi, ZhuZhouBinYiShangMaoYouXianGongSi, SUSTA, ZhuShanXianXiongDiYuanSongShiZhuBaoZhongXin, lingqiuxianchunhenongyejixieyouxiangongsi, SUP-SKDW, GH-GSY, CooL Z, hoanguyentn2203, ChenKaiMaoYi, Broad Universe, WEN QEE, jiaguozheng, xxufjh, WannaSong, MAOLI HOME, KONGHUI STORE, Defendant 6, Defendant 15, Defendant 17, Defendant 22, Defendant 27 and Defendant 29 added to case caption. (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 34 MEMORANDUM by Lauren Maree Edmonds in support of motion for default judgment #33 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 33 MOTION by Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to defendant no. 24 AZCJC (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 31 CERTIFICATE of Service by Keith A. Vogt on behalf of Lauren Maree Edmonds regarding text entry,,,, #30 (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 30 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction #27 . In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all remaining defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by or before January 30, 2026." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's order entering the TRO, the TRO is extended to and including the date upon which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 29 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lauren Maree Edmonds as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 1/8/2026, answer due 1/29/2026. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service, Keith A. Vogt)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 28 MEMORANDUM by Lauren Maree Edmonds in support of motion for preliminary injunction #27 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Keith A. Vogt)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 27 MOTION by Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds for preliminary injunction (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 26 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (lm, ) |
| Filing 24 SURETY BOND in the amount of $10,000.00 posted by Lauren Maree Edmonds (Document not scanned). (bi,) |
| Filing 23 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| Filing 22 SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 12/30/2025. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal #14 , motion for leave to file excess pages #15 , and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and for electronic service of process 16 are granted as to Amended Schedule A. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, plaintiff may file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Status hearing is set for 2/23/26 at 9:00 a.m. to track the case only. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 20 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (bi, ) |
| Filing 19 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Lauren Maree Edmonds regarding memorandum in support of motion, #17 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION of Declaration of Lauren Maree Edmonds regarding memorandum in support of motion, #17 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in support of 16 Exparte motion (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration, #3 Declaration of Lauren Maree Edmonds, #4 Exhibit 1, of Lauren Maree Edmonds's declaration)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds for leave to file excess pages (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds for leave to file under seal (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 13 Amended Schedule A to the Complaint #1 and Schedule A #2 by Lauren Maree Edmonds (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 12 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that, due to a clerical error case 25-cv-14539, Lauren Maree Edmonds v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, was reassigned in error to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin pursuant to 28 USC 294 (b), therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the assignment of case 25-cv-14539, Lauren Maree Edmonds v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin be vacated as the assigned judge and the case shall be reassigned by lot to a regular active district judge. Case reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings for all further proceedings. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/1/2025. (td, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas Durkin for all further proceedings pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 294(b). Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Request for reassignment) (ags) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre (Mcintyre, Cameron) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds by Christopher Romero (Romero, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds by Monica Rita Martin (Martin, Monica) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lauren Maree Edmonds by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 Schedule A to Complaint #1 by Lauren Maree Edmonds (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lauren Maree Edmonds; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24410535. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Vogt, Keith) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (qrtr, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (qrtr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
