Sullivan v. Village of Summit et al
Plaintiff: Steven Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant: Timothy Skorepa and John Doe
Case Number: 1:2026cv03072
Filed: March 19, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2026 Filing 31 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the motion to dismiss. The response is due four weeks from entry of this order, and the reply is due two weeks later. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
September 3, 2026 Filing 30 First AMENDED complaint by Steven Sullivan, Jr against John Doe, Timothy Skorepa and terminating Village of Summit as a Matter of Course under FRCP (a)(1)(B) (Sadelski, Peter)
September 3, 2026 Filing 29 PARTIAL ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit(Eberhardt, Susan)
September 3, 2026 Filing 28 MEMORANDUM by Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit in support of motion to dismiss #27 COUNT II OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT (Eberhardt, Susan)
September 3, 2026 Filing 27 MOTION by Defendants Village of Summit, Timothy Skorepa to dismiss COUNT II OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT (Eberhardt, Susan)
August 12, 2026 Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendants' motion for an extension of time (Dckt. No. #23 ) is hereby granted. As proposed, a responsive pleading is due by September 3, 2026. Mailed notice (lf, )
August 4, 2026 Filing 25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit by Shannon Cottrell (Cottrell, Shannon)
August 4, 2026 Filing 24 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit by Matthew Byron Knight (Knight, Matthew)
August 3, 2026 Filing 23 MOTION by Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Eberhardt, Susan)
August 3, 2026 Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit by Susan Jacqueline Eberhardt (Eberhardt, Susan)
August 3, 2026 Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit by Matthew Scott Clark (Clark, Matthew)
August 3, 2026 Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant's motion to substitute counsel (Dckt. No. #19 ) is granted. Attorney Susan Jacqueline Eberhardt, Matthew S. Clark and Shannon Cottrell are added as counsel for Village of Summit. Counsel from Odelson, Murphey, Frazier & McGrath, Ltd. are terminated as counsel of record. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
July 17, 2026 Filing 19 MOTION by Defendants John Doe, Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit to substitute attorney (McGrath, Sean)
July 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER RULE 16(b) Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 7/8/2026. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
July 8, 2026 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the joint initial status report. (Dckt. No. #16 ) The Court adopts the proposed schedule. Fact discovery will close on February 26, 2027. Scheduling Order to follow. That's enough time for discovery, so the parties should not bank on an extension. The parties must file a status report by October 15, 2026. The status report must provide an update on discovery and on settlement discussions, including whether they seek a settlement conference. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
June 26, 2026 Filing 16 STATUS Report Initial Joint by Steven Sullivan, Jr (Sadelski, Peter)
June 18, 2026 Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit by Michael Joseph Hayes, Jr (Hayes, Michael)
June 18, 2026 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit by Sean Patrick McGrath (McGrath, Sean)
June 18, 2026 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Timothy Skorepa, Village of Summit by Michael J. McGrath (McGrath, Michael)
June 15, 2026 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Steven Sullivan, Jr. Timothy Skorepa waiver sent on 3/20/2026, answer due 5/19/2026. (Sadelski, Peter)
June 15, 2026 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Steven Sullivan, Jr. Village of Summit waiver sent on 3/20/2026, answer due 5/19/2026. (Sadelski, Peter)
June 12, 2026 Filing 10 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Timothy Skorepa (jm, )
June 12, 2026 Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Village of Summit (jm, )
June 8, 2026 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: At the plaintiff's request, the deadline to file a joint initial status report is extended to June 26, 2026. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
March 19, 2026 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: There is no need for a certificate of service for a court filing when all parties of record receive a copy through CM/ECF. Under the Local Rules, "[a] certificate of service is required only when service of a document filed on the Court's E-Filing system is made on a recipient who is not an E-Filer listed on the docket of the proceeding." See L.R. 5.5(a); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)(B) ("No certificate of service is required when a paper is served by filing it with the court's electronic-filing system."). The Court handles service through CM/ECF. In effect, the CM/ECF header is the certificate of service. Save yourself the work, and the trouble. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
March 19, 2026 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by June 2, 2026. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at [email protected] to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
March 19, 2026 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Steven Sullivan, Jr by Peter T. Sadelski (Sadelski, Peter)
March 19, 2026 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sadelski, Peter)
March 19, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Steven Sullivan, Jr; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24868628.(Sadelski, Peter)
March 19, 2026 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (man, )
March 19, 2026 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (man, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sullivan v. Village of Summit et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Sullivan, Jr.
Represented By: Peter T. Sadelski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Skorepa
Represented By: Matthew Byron Knight
Represented By: Susan Jacqueline Eberhardt
Represented By: Shannon Cottrell
Represented By: Matthew Scott Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Susan Jacqueline Eberhardt
Represented By: Shannon Cottrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?