Pyzynski v. Bisignano
| Marie Pyzynski |
| Frank Bisignano |
| Service List |
| 1:2026cv04421 |
| April 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Young B Kim |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Frank Bisignano (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Cooney, Nigel) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government is ordered to file a certified copy of the administrative record by June 22, 2026, but it should not submit a hard copy of the administrative record to chambers unless ordered to do so. Plaintiff's opening brief for remanding or reversing the Commissioner's final decision is due by July 22, 2026. The government's response brief in support of the final decision is due by August 21, 2026. Plaintiff's reply brief is due by September 4, 2026, but one is not required. (ec, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: CONSENT REASSIGNMENT of case to the Honorable Young B. Kim, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment) (cvk, ) |
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Nigel B Cooney as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Frank Bisignano (Cooney, Nigel) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Marie Pyzynski; N. (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. Notices Mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 4 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (aw, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marie Pyzynski by Bryan Konoski (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Marie Pyzynski for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Marie Pyzynski; N. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Konoski, Bryan) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office. |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (aw, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
