Ellis v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
| Addie Ellis |
| Avlon Industries, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and SoftSheen-Carson (W.I.), Inc. |
| Service List |
| 1:2026cv04607 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: AttorneyRebecca Kingof the law firmKeller Postman LLC's moved to withdrawfrom representing Plaintiff in this case. See 1854 on main MDL docket 23-cv-818.The Court grants Attorney King's motion to withdraw. See 1880 on main MDL docket 23-cv-818. AttorneyKingisterminatedas counsel of record. Plaintiff will continue to be represented byLauren Schultz of Keller Postman LLC. See 1854 . Mailed notice (tg, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Addie Ellis by Rebecca King (King, Rebecca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (King, Rebecca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Addie Ellis; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25021289.(King, Rebecca) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category MDL Rowland). (mam, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.