Davis v. Clarity Cosmetics Inc.
| Nicole Davis |
| Clarity Cosmetics Inc. |
| 1:2026cv06372 |
| May 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend all deadlines, #9 , is granted. Initial status hearing is reset for 8/12/2026 at 9:00 a.m. in person in Courtroom 2325. By 8/5/2026, the parties shall file an Initial Joint Status Report. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Nicole Davis for extension of time for All Deadlines (Chan, Alison) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Initial status hearing set for 7/7/2026 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2325. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Nicole Davis. Clarity Cosmetics Inc. waiver sent on 6/4/2026, answer due 8/3/2026. (Chan, Alison) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 7/7/2026. Mailed notice. (Attachments: #1 Outline for the initial joint status report) (lxk, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Clarity Cosmetics Inc. (jks, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (eak, Emily) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (eak, Emily) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nicole Davis by Alison Chan (Chan, Alison) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Chan, Alison) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nicole Davis; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25185244.(Chan, Alison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Clarity Cosmetics Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicole Davis | |
| Represented By: | Alison Chan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clarity Cosmetics Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
