Kim Haskins v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Plaintiff: Kim Haskins
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Case Number: 1:2026cv13521
Filed: November 2, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sunil R. Harjani
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2026 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Haskins by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam)
November 2, 2026 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Haskins by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre (Mcintyre, Cameron)
November 2, 2026 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Haskins by Christopher Romero (Romero, Christopher)
November 2, 2026 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Haskins by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi)
November 2, 2026 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Haskins by Monica Rita Martin (Martin, Monica)
November 2, 2026 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Haskins by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling)
November 2, 2026 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kim Haskins by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith)
November 2, 2026 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith)
November 2, 2026 Filing 2 Schedule A to Complaint #1 by Kim Haskins (Vogt, Keith)
November 2, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kim Haskins ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25890477. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Vogt, Keith)
November 2, 2026 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (eak, )
November 2, 2026 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (eak, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim Haskins v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Haskins
Represented By: Keith A. Vogt
Represented By: Yi Bu
Represented By: Monica Rita Martin
Represented By: Christopher Romero
Represented By: Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
Represented By: Adam Grodman
Represented By: Yanling Jiang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?