Finova Capital Corporation v. Bishop
Finova Capital Corporation |
James Bishop |
3:2008cv50060 |
April 9, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Real Property: Other Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Frederick J Kapala |
P Michael Mahoney |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the Deputy Clerk for Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 9/10/2009:(pg, ) |
Filing 59 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala: Defendant's motion for summary judgment #30 is granted. Plaintiff's motion to file a sur-reply #44 is granted and the sur-reply has been considered. This case is closed.[For further details see text below.] Civil case terminated. Docketing mailed notice (pg, ) |
Filing 58 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Telephonic Discovery hearing held on 9/1/2009. Telephonic Discovery Hearing set for 10/6/2009 at 10:00 AM. Telephoned notice (glg, ) |
Filing 57 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Telephonic Discovery hearing held on 7/20/2009. Telephonic Discovery Hearing set for 9/1/2009 at 10:00 AM. Telephoned notice (glg, ) |
Filing 56 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James Bishop by Matthew Marzano Litvak (Litvak, Matthew) |
Filing 55 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Motion hearing held. Defendant's motion for Stephen Carponelli and Ross Carponelli to withdraw as counsel #53 is granted. Defendant given to July 15, 2009 to obtain counsel. Discovery stayed until July 15, 2009. Counsel or defendant to participate in previously set telephonic discovery hearing set for July 20, 2009 at10:00 am.Electronic notice (pg, ) |
Filing 54 NOTICE of Motion by Ross Stephen Carponelli for presentment of motion to withdraw as attorney #53 before Honorable P. Michael Mahoney on 6/24/2009 at 01:30 PM. (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 53 MOTION by counsel for Defendant James Bishop to withdraw as attorney (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 52 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Plaintiff's Motion to strike #45 is withdrawn. Presentment date stricken. Mailed notice (glg, ) |
Filing 51 NOTICE by James Bishop re amended answer to complaint #50 (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 50 AMENDED Answer by Defendant James Bishop to complaint #1 (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 49 Amended NOTICE of Motion by Joseph B. Prater for presentment of motion to strike, motion for relief #45 before Honorable P. Michael Mahoney on 6/5/2009 at 01:30 PM. (Prater, Joseph)[Judge Association Modified on 5/22/2009] (pg, ). |
Filing 48 NOTICE by James Bishop re response in opposition to motion #47 (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 47 RESPONSE by James Bishopin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Finova Capital Corporation to strike answer to complaint #40 #45 (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 46 NOTICE of Motion by John William Moynihan for presentment of motion to strike, motion for relief #45 before Honorable P. Michael Mahoney on 5/22/2009 at 01:30 PM. (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 45 MOTION by Plaintiff Finova Capital Corporation to strike answer to complaint #40 (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 44 MOTION by Plaintiff Finova Capital Corporation to file instanter In Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Moynihan, John) |
Filing 43 NOTICE by James Bishop re reply to response to motion #42 (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 42 REPLY by James Bishop to Response #31 , memorandum in opposition to motion, #32 (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 41 NOTICE by James Bishop re answer to complaint #40 (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 40 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by James Bishop(Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 39 NOTICE by James Bishop re answer to complaint #38 and Affirmative Defenses (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 38 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by James Bishop(Carponelli, Ross) Modified on 4/8/2009 (jat, ). [attached Answer does not state a Jury Demand; signed by Stephen P. Carponelli] |
Filing 37 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Plaintiff's Motion to set final pretrial #35 is denied at this time. (glg, ) |
Filing 36 NOTICE of Motion by John William Moynihan for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief #35 before Honorable P. Michael Mahoney on 4/1/2009 at 01:30 PM. (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 35 MOTION by Plaintiff Finova Capital Corporation To Set A Final PreTrial Conference (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 34 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala: Defendant's motion to dismiss #15 is denied.[For further details see text below.]Docketing mailed notice (pg, ) |
Filing 33 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Telephonic Discovery hearing held on 3/18/2009. Defendant's MOTION for summary judgment #30 is taken under advisement; Set deadlines as to motion for summary judgment #30 : Response filed. Replies due by 4/8/2009. If a party is not going to file a brief in response or reply, it is the obligation of that party, within the time frame established by this order, to so notify the court in writing. Telephonic Discovery Hearing set for 7/20/2009 at 10:00 AM. Mailed notice (glg, ) |
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM by Finova Capital Corporation in Opposition to motion for summary judgment #30 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Moynihan, John) |
Filing 31 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Finova Capital Corporation Response to Defendant's Rule 56.1 Statement of Facts (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 30 MOTION by Defendant James Bishop for summary judgment (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 29 NOTICE by James Bishop (Carponelli, Ross) |
Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney:Discovery hearing held on 2/11/2009. Telephonic Discovery Hearing set for 3/18/2009 at 10:00 AM. Plaintiff to place the call. (glg, ) |
Filing 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney:Discovery hearing held on 1/16/2009. Discovery Hearing to set ADR set for 2/11/2009 at 01:30 PM. (glg, ) |
Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney:Discovery hearing held on 12/3/2008. Plaintiff shall comply with FRCP(26)(a)(2) by 1/12/09. Depositions by 1/30/09. Defendant shall comply with FRCP(26)(a)(2) by 1/16/09. Depositions by 1/30/09. All Discovery ordered closed by 1/30/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 2/27/2009. Discovery Hearing set for 1/16/2009 at 01:30 PM.) (glg, ) |
Filing 25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Telephonic Discovery hearing held on 11/14/2008. Discovery Hearing set for 12/3/2008 at 01:30 PM. Telephoned notice (glg, ) |
Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Telephonic Discovery hearing held on 10/8/2008. Fact Discovery ordered closed by 12/3/2008. Dispositive Motions due by 1/12/2009. Telephonic Discovery Hearing set for 11/14/2008 at 10:45 AM. Telephoned notice (glg, ) |
Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Service by Stephen P. Carponelli on behalf of James Bishop (Carponelli, Stephen) Modified on 8/26/2008 (jat, ). [discovery document] |
Filing 22 NOTICE by James Bishop re reply to response to motion #21 (Carponelli, Stephen) |
Filing 21 REPLY by James Bishop to response to motion #20 (Carponelli, Stephen) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE by Finova Capital Corporation to MOTION by Defendant James Bishop to dismiss Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(b)(6) #15 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Moynihan, John) |
Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Initial pretrial conference held on 7/30/2008. Case management order approved as stated in open court. FRCP 26(a)(1) disclosure due 9/21/08. FRCP 26(a)(2) reserved. Parties are given 10 interrogatories each. Depositions limited to 5 hours. Amended Pleadings due by 9/29/2008. Fact Discovery ordered closed by 11/3/2008. Dispositive Motions due by 12/8/2008. Discovery Hearing set for 10/8/2008 at 01:30 PM. Defendant's Motion to dismiss #15 is taken under advisement. Presentment date stricken. Set deadlines as to motion to dismiss #15 : Responses due by 8/6/2008, Replies due by 8/13/2008. If a party is not going to file a brief in response or reply, it is that partys obligation, within the time frame established by this order, to so notify the court in writing. Mailed notice (glg, ) |
Filing 18 Parties Joint Proposed Case Management Order by Finova Capital Corporation (Prater, Joseph) |
Filing 17 Amended NOTICE of Motion by Stephen P. Carponelli for presentment of motion to dismiss #15 before Honorable P. Michael Mahoney on 8/8/2008 at 09:00 AM. (Carponelli, Stephen) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James Bishop by Stephen P. Carponelli (Carponelli, Stephen) |
Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant James Bishop to dismiss Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(b)(6) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Carponelli, Stephen) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Stephen P. Carponelli for presentment of before Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 8/8/2008 at 09:00 AM. (Carponelli, Stephen) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney:Status hearing held on 6/25/2008. Response to complaint due by 7/28/2008. Parties to hold Rule 26 Meeting. Case management order due by 7/29/2008. Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/30/2008 at 01:30 PM. (glg, ) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Finova Capital Corporation as to James Bishop on 6/9/2008, answer due 6/30/2008. (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant James Bishop (pg, ) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney:Status hearing held on 5/21/2008. Status hearing set for 6/25/2008 at 01:30 PM. (glg, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before Judge Honorable P. Michael Mahoney: Status hearing set for 5/21/2008 at 01:30 PM. Plaintiff is directed to notify any party filing an appearance subsequent to the entry of this order, of the status hearing. Mailed notice (glg, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before Judge Frederick J. Kapala: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for relief from filing error #6 is denied. This civil diversity action was originally filed under case no. 08-cv-50043 and assigned to my calender in this court's Western Division in accordance with the court's internal operating procedure. Plaintiff filed no objection but, rather, filed a notice of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Thereafter, plaintiff refiled the same action. Local Rule 40.3(b)(2) provides that "[w]hen a case is dismissed with prejudice or without, and a second case is filed involving the same parties and relating to the same subject matter, the second case shall be assigned to the judge to whom the first case was assigned." Electronic notice (jat, ) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION of John W. Moynihan regarding motion for miscellaneous relief #6 by Finova Capital Corporation for relief from a filing error (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Finova Capital Corporation for Relief from a filing Error (Moynihan, John) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Finova Capital Corporation by Gary Steven Caplan, John William Moynihan, Joseph B. Prater (pg, ) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
Filing 2 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Finova Capital Corporation (pg, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Finova Capital Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350.(pg, ) |
THIS matter is referred to the Honorable P. Michael Mahoney pursuant to Internal Operating Procedure 11(d) (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.