Fortney v. Stephenson County
Plaintiff: Darnell Fortney
Defendant: Stephenson County
Case Number: 3:2012cv50282
Filed: July 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Rockford Office
County: Stephenson
Presiding Judge: Frederick J. Kapala
Presiding Judge: P. Michael Mahoney
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 4/10/2013: Defendants' motion to dismiss 18 is granted in part and denied in part.[ For further details see text below.] Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 4/10/2013:Docketing mailed notice(pg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fortney v. Stephenson County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephenson County
Represented By: Karin Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darnell Fortney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?