Gregory Baker v. State Of Illinois And The Illinois Dept. Of Corrections et al
Gregory Baker |
State Of Illinois And The Illinois Dept. Of Corrections, Wexford Medical Health Corp., Nedra Chandler, Amber Allen, Dominguez, Funk, Cindy Eyecamp and Hebben |
3:2013cv50193 |
June 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Rockford Office |
Lee |
Iain D. Johnston |
Philip G. Reinhard |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 ORDER Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 7/28/2015 : For the reasons stated below, the defendants' motion to strike 106 is denied and defendants' motion for summary judgment 86 is granted as to Dr. Dominguez and Dr. Funk and granted in part and denied in part with regard to Wexford. The parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Iain Johnston's chambers by August 24, 2015 to arrange for a settlement conference with regard to the remaining claims. [See STATEMENT - OPINION] Mailed notice (jp, ) |
Filing 58 ORDER and WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 4/4/2014: For the reasons stated below, defendants Nedra Chandler and Darla Habbens motion to dismiss 30 is denied and defendant Wexford Health Sources, Inc.s motion to dismiss 20 is denied. (See Statement-Opinion for detail) Mailed notice(ngm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.