Anderson v. City Of Rockford et al.
| Tyjuan Anderson |
| City Of Rockford, Dominic Iasparro, Joseph Stevens, James Randall, Doug Palmer, Scott Mastroianni, Theo Glover, Kurt Whisenhand, Torry Regez, Sheryl Lindmark and Unknown Employees Of The City Of Rockford, John Does One Through Nine |
| 3:2015cv50065 |
| March 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rockford Office |
| Winnebago |
| Iain D. Johnston |
| Frederick J. Kapala |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
304
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the opinion and order, the Court will give Plaintiffs the opportunity to file a brief of no more than ten pages, due by 1/15/2020, addressing the admissibility of the evidence discussed in this order, with a response from Randall due 1/29/2020. The Court reserves ruling on Plaintiffs' motion 288 until then. Plaintiffs should be prepared at the status hearing on 12/18/2019 to discuss whether they intend to file such a brief or they will no longer pursue a claim against Randall. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/17/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER : Palmer's motion for summary judgment 210 is granted. Rockford police officers' motion for summary judgment 215 is granted. City of Rockford's motion for summary judgment 217 is granted. All other pending motions 166 190 are denied as moot. This case is closed. [See STATEMENT] Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 5/23/2018. Mailed notice(jp, )
|
|
Filing
244
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order; Defendants Joint Motion to Compel (Dkts. #177 and #156) is granted. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery from Individual Defendants Expert Witness (Dkts. #215 and #195) is granted. The information sought by the Defendants motion and the documents sought by the Plaintiffs motion must be provided by April 16, 2018. Discovery remains closed. (See attachment for full detail.) Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 3/27/2018: (yxp, )
|
|
Filing
132
Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") from the magistrate judge that this court grant defendants' motion to bar live testimony of Lonnie Young and Toni Gulley and deny defendants' request for sanctions related to their motion to compel. Any objection to the R&R was to be filed by January 10, 2017. No objection has been received. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985). Having reviewed the R&R [Johnson , Dkt. 150; Anderson, Dkt. 130] and finding no error, the court adopts the R&R in full and grants defendants' motion to bar Young's and Gulley's live testimony [Johnson, Dkt. 131; Anderson, Dkt. 113] and denies defendants' request for sanctions [Johnson, Dkt. 128; Anderson, Dkt. 111]. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 1/19/2017. Mailed notice (jp, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER: Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") from the magistrate judge 63 recommending denial of the parties' agreed motion to consolidate 57 this case with case number 15 C 50064 for the purposes of discovery and pretrial matters only. The magistrate judge recommends denying the agreed motion, as the cases have already been consolidated for the purposes of discovery and the only benefit to the parties' motion would be to reduce the number of plead ings filed by the parties, but those pleadings would eventually lead to greater confusion when the court would unconsolidate the cases for trial. The magistrate judge also recommends that the denial be without prejudice, should the parties later d ecide to consolidate the cases in a more substantive way. Despite being given an opportunity, no party objects to the R&R. Without belaboring the point, the court agrees with and adopts the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, there bein g no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985) and the court having reviewed the R&R, the court accepts the R&R 63 and denies the motion to consolidate 57 without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 2/24/2016:mailed notice(pg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
