Edwards v. Howard

Edwards v. Howard

Plaintiff:	Michael W. Edwards
Defendant:	G. Howard
Case Number:	3:2015cv50228
Filed:	September 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Rockford Office
County:	Winnebago
Presiding Judge:	Iain D. Johnston
Presiding Judge:	Philip G. Reinhard
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2015	Filing 5 ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 10/1/2015: The court grants plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court waives the initial partial fee, but authorizes and orders the trust fund officer at plaintiff's place of in carceration to begin making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The court on its own motion dismisses Lieutenant Egler and Correctional Officer Ferguson as defendants on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court dir ects the Clerk of Court to: (1) mail a copy of this order to the trust account office at the Winnebago County Jail; (2) file plaintiffs complaint 1 , (3) issue summons for service on defendant Howard by the U.S. Marshal and (4) send plaintiff a bla nk USM-285 service form, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. The court advises plaintiff that a completed USM-285 form is required for service on the defendant. The U.S. Marshal will not attempt service on defendant unless and until the required form is received. (See statement for further detail) Mailed notice(ngm, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2015

Filing 5 ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 10/1/2015: The court grants plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court waives the initial partial fee, but authorizes and orders the trust fund officer at plaintiff's place of in carceration to begin making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The court on its own motion dismisses Lieutenant Egler and Correctional Officer Ferguson as defendants on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court dir ects the Clerk of Court to: (1) mail a copy of this order to the trust account office at the Winnebago County Jail; (2) file plaintiffs complaint 1 , (3) issue summons for service on defendant Howard by the U.S. Marshal and (4) send plaintiff a bla nk USM-285 service form, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. The court advises plaintiff that a completed USM-285 form is required for service on the defendant. The U.S. Marshal will not attempt service on defendant unless and until the required form is received. (See statement for further detail) Mailed notice(ngm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Howard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael W. Edwards
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: G. Howard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?