The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Airdronic Test & Balance, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Airdronic Test & Balance, Inc.

The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Airdronic Test & Balance, Inc.

Plaintiff:	The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:	Airdronic Test & Balance, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2017cv50247
Filed:	August 18, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Rockford Office
County:	Winnebago
Presiding Judge:	Iain D. Johnston
Presiding Judge:	Frederick J. Kapala
Nature of Suit:	Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 5, 2018	Filing 24 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations:Before the court is a report and recommendation (R&R) 23 from the magistrate judge that this court grant plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment 20 in favor of plaintiff and against defend ant in the amount of $21,603.70. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judges R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the r ecord and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and grants plaintiffs motion for entry of default judgment. Default judgment will enter against defendant in the amount of $21,603.70. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 3/5/2018:mailed notice(pg, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 5, 2018

Filing 24 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations:Before the court is a report and recommendation (R&R) 23 from the magistrate judge that this court grant plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment 20 in favor of plaintiff and against defend ant in the amount of $21,603.70. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judges R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the r ecord and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and grants plaintiffs motion for entry of default judgment. Default judgment will enter against defendant in the amount of $21,603.70. This case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 3/5/2018:mailed notice(pg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Airdronic Test & Balance, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Represented By:	Troy E. Haggestad
Represented By:	Joel M. L. Huotari
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Airdronic Test & Balance, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?