Lash v. Hudson et al
Petitioner: Anthony Lash
Respondent: D. Hudson
Case Number: 3:2017cv50385
Filed: December 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Rockford Office
County: Carroll
Presiding Judge: Iain D. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Philip G. Reinhard
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER-WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 7/2/2018: For the reasons stated below, Anthony Lash's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 1 , is dismissed. This matter is closed. [see STATEMENT-OPINION] Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 7/2/2018. Mailed notice (kms)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lash v. Hudson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Lash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. Hudson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?