Carroll et al v. Barcenas et al
| Christopher Carroll and Paul Carroll |
| Jose A. Barcenas and Bay Valley Foods, LLC |
| 3:2019cv50140 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 7/2/2019.Mailed notice.(jlj, ) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 7/2/2019.Mailed notice.(jlj, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, this case is dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The status hearing set for 7/12/2019 #5 is stricken. Enter judgment order. Civil case closed.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause to response to order to show cause #7 , complaint #1 (Khare, Mohit) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Carroll as to Bay Valley Foods, LLC on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. (Khare, Mohit) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Plaintiffs' jurisdictional addendum properly alleges the citizenship of Plaintiffs and Defendant Barcenas, but not that of Defendant Bay Valley Foods, LLC. As stated in the 6/17/2019 order #5 , Plaintiffs have until 7/1/2019 to properly allege the citizenship of Defendant Bay Valley Foods, LLC. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this suit for want of subject matter jurisdiction.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause to complaint #1 (Khare, Mohit) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Jose A. Barcenas, Bay Valley Foods, LLC (rc, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Christopher Carroll, Paul Carroll by Adam S Long (Long, Adam) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:On the court's own motion, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause by 7/1/2019 why this case should not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The complaint premises jurisdiction under the diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), but it does not properly allege the citizenship of any party. See Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 534 (7th Cir. 2007); Meyerson v. Harrah's East Chicago Casino, 299 F.3d 616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002). Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a Jurisdictional Addendum that properly alleges the citizenship of each party. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal for want of subject matter jurisdiction of this case. Status hearing set for 7/12/2019 at 9:45 a.m. Attorneys who wish to participate by telephone at the next status hearing should call Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to the Third Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 6/4/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable Gary Feinerman and referred generally to the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/4/2019. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Christopher Carroll, Paul Carroll by Mohit Khare (Khare, Mohit) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Khare, Mohit) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Paul Carroll; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15931967.(Khare, Mohit) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
