Castaneda v. Heinrich et al
| Laura Castaneda |
| Ken Rosenkrans and Sons Trucking, Inc. and Nathan Heinrich |
| 3:2019cv50239 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 12/2/2019 at 9:30AM in the Rockford Courthouse. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 11/20/2019. The parties are required to appear in person. The general referral to Magistrate Judge Iain D. Johnston is terminated for all purposes. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Status report #8 received and reviewed. Supplemental report detailing the plaintiff's efforts to personally serve the defendants shall be filed by 11/13/2019. (yxp, ) |
| Filing 8 STATUS Report re Service of Process by Laura Castaneda (Sandberg, Craig) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: On 9/25/2019 the Court directed plaintiff's counsel to file a written report on the status of serving the defendants by 10/21/2019. To date, counsel has filed nothing. The written report on the status of service is now due 10/23/2019. (yxp, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: By 10/21/2019, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a status report informing the court of the status of service on the defendants. (yxp, ) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to the Fourth Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 6/27/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis and referred generally to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/27/2019. (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED complaint by Laura Castaneda against Nathan Heinrich;Ken Rosenkrans And Sons Trucking, Inc., (Sandberg, Craig) Modified on 9/25/2019 (pg, ). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Upon review of the plaintiff's complaint, the Court notes that the allegations in support of diversity jurisdiction are deficient. For instance, the plaintiff alleges her residence, not citizenship. Meyerson v. Harrahs East Chicago Casino, 299 F.3d 616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002). Same for the individual defendant. As for the corporate defendant, she does not allege its state of incorporation and principal place of business -- instead of a state, she identifies a judicial district. Dalton v. Teva North America, 891 F.3d 687, 690 (7th Cir. 2018). See also "Know the Answer to Federal Jurisdiction," available on this Court's webpage. Finally, the allegations of damages appear to include a typographical error: "damages are in excess of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00)." Dkt. 1 at 5. By 10/21/2019 plaintiff's counsel shall file an amended complaint to cure any deficiencies in her allegations of diversity jurisdiction. (yxp, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sandberg, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Laura Castaneda; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16263068.(Sandberg, Craig) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis and Honorable Iain D. Johnston. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Iain D. Johnston. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
