Gevas v. Sheehy et al
| David Gevas |
| Amber Allen, C. Okezie, Marlene Henzie, Amy Pohl-Jacobs, Sonja Nicklaus, Joe Sheehy, John/Jane Does, John Varga, Jared Brunk, Marrill J. Zahtz and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv50146 |
| April 28, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Philip G Reinhard |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties are must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020. Mailed notice (jp, )
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION by Plaintiff David Gevas to Serve Defendants by Plaintiff. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Plaintiff David Gevas for Consolidation. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION by Plaintiff David Gevas for Additional Time to Pay Filing Fee. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED COMPLAINT by David Gevas; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (jp, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
