O'Quinn v. Nicklaus et al
| Chester O'Quinn |
| Jane Doe, Nurse Peppers, Amber Allen, John Baldwin, John Doe, Garza, Sonja Nicklaus, Warden Varga, Nurse Jackson, Nurse Tyling, James Chess, Officer Stock and Nurse Mentors |
| 3:2020cv50210 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PRISONER Trust Fund Account Statement. (aee, ) |
| Filing 11 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Chester O'Quinn. (aee, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk10, Docket)
|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Chester O'Quinn. (aee, ) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Chester O'Quinn for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT filed by Chester O'Quinn. (jh, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER : The Court denies Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to proceed to screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915A, he must either (1) prepay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00; or (2) submit a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with the instructions in the statement section of this order. Failure to comply by July 14, 2020, will result in summary dismissal of this case. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. Failure to keep the Court informed of his address may lead to dismissal of this case for failure to comply with a Court order and for want of prosecution. Plaintiff's motion "for preparation of summonses and [to] require IDOC to produce the names for the male and female officers" #4 is denied as premature. The Court defers initial review of Plaintiff's complaint until his fee status has been resolved. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. [See STATEMENT] Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 6/23/2020. Mailed notice (jp, )
|
| MAILED copy of order dated 6/23/2020 and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to Chester O'Quinn. (jp, ) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to the Fourth Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 6/27/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable John Robert Blakey and referred generally to the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/27/2019. (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Chester O'Quinn for Preparation of Summonses and Require IDOC to Produce the Names for the Male and Female Officers. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Chester O'Quinn for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Chester O'Quinn; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-101, #2 Exhibit 102) (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
