Davis v. United States Department of State et al
| William Scott Davis, Jr |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Administrative Offices of the Courts, United States Department of State, United States Probation Office, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, United States Federal Bureau of Investigations, The, United States Embassy Belgium, United States Passport Agency, United States Immigration Customs Enforcement, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Child and Family Services, United States Executive Offices of the United States Attorney Offices, United States Department Of Justice and United States Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv50214 |
| June 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Pursuant to the Fourth Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 6/27/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin and referred generally to the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/27/2019. (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by William Scott Davis, Jr; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
