Croffoot v. Saul
| Jolene A. Croffoot |
| Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 3:2020cv50219 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Defendant's motion for extension of time to file the administrative record #9 is unopposed and granted. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 10/16/2020. Mailed notice (jp, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 SSA Declaration)(Brady, Jana) |
Filing 8
ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk10, Docket)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Signed by Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/25/2020.(rp, )
|
| Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Jana L Brady as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Brady, Jana) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to the Fourth Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 6/27/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin and referred generally to the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/27/2019. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jolene A. Croffoot by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jolene A. Croffoot; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17118079. (Attachments: #1 ALJ decision)(Schultz, Barry) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Croffoot v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Jana L Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jolene A. Croffoot | |
| Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
