Olek v. Saul
Plaintiff: Sarah E Olek and Sarah E. Olek
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv50229
Filed: June 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Lisa A Jensen
Referring Judge: John Z Lee
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Defendant's motion for extension of time to file the administrative record #15 is unopposed and granted. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 10/23/2020. Mailed notice (jp, )
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Mallory, Monica)
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk10, Docket)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Plaintiff's motion for waiver of Local Rule 83.15 #12 is unopposed and granted. The Court waives the requirement for Plaintiff's counsel to designate local counsel in this case, unless otherwise ordered. Mailed notice (jp, )
July 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Sarah E. Olek for Waiver of Local Rule 83.15 (UNOPPOSED) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Richter, Matthew)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: In light of the reassignment of this case, the status hearing previously set for 7/13/2020 is stricken. Additionally, briefing will proceed as set out in Judge Jensen's standing order for Social Security Cases. Plaintiff's counsel is reminded to obtain local counsel pursuant to Local Rule 83.15. Mailed notice (jp, )
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable John Z. Lee no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Z. Lee on 6/29/2020. (bg, )
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The parties filed a joint consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case will be reassigned.Mailed notice (ca, )
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Minute order #5 is corrected: Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), the defendant is to file its answer and administrative record no later than 8/24/20. Plaintiff's opening brief is due within 9/22/20. Defendant's response brief is due 10/20/20. Plaintiff's reply brief is due 11/4/20. Ruling by mail. Counsel should note that these dates modify the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/PUBLIC/Forms/consent.pdf. Telephone Conference set for 7/13/2020 at 9:00 a.m. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==.Mailed notice (ca, )
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Richter, Matthew)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Monica V Mallory as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Mallory, Monica)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), the defendant is to file its answer and administrative record no later than 8/24/20. Plaintiff's opening brief is due within 9/22/20. Defendant's response brief is due 10/20/20. Plaintiff's reply brief is due 9/4/20. Ruling by mail. Counsel should note that these dates modify the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/PUBLIC/Forms/consent.pdf. Telephone Conference set for 7/13/2020 at 9:00 a.m. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==.Mailed notice (ca, )
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Pursuant to the Fourth Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 6/27/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable John Z. Lee and referred generally to the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/27/2019. (jp, )
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sarah E. Olek by Matthew Frederick Richter (Richter, Matthew)
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Sarah E. Olek for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Richter, Matthew)
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Sarah E. Olek; (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew)
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order MAILED Local Rule 83.15 to Counsel for plaintiff. (jp, )
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olek v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Monica V Mallory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah E Olek
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah E. Olek
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?