Ruiz v. Francis, Jr. et al
| Israel Ruiz |
| John R. Baldwin, Adkison Hilgendorf, Shellie A., Jane/John Doe, John Frost, Caradean, Bueller, Robin Gilliam Randolph, Wexford, Steve R. Gans, Melisa L. Schulths, Lois L. Lindorff, Dave White, Gary Beams, Dr. Strow Francis, Jr., Emily, Stephany Dorothy and John/Jane Doe |
| 3:2020cv50429 |
| November 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Philip G Reinhard |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to submit his amended complaint #9 is granted. Failure to submit an amended complaint by January 29, 2021, will result in summary dismissal of this lawsuit. Plaintiff's motion to show proof that the filing fee was paid #8 is denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 12/28/2020:notice mailed by judicial staff (pg, )
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for extension of time to Amend Complaint by Plaintiff Israel Ruiz. (Exhibit). (jn, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Israel Ruizto show the court proof that the filing fee on this case was fully paid. (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER : Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice. If plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must submit an amended complaint that complies with this order. Failure to submit an amended complaint by January 11, 2021, will result in summary dismissal of this lawsuit. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff an amended complaint form and instructions along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's motion for additional time #6 to pay the filing fee is denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #3 is denied without prejudice as it is too early in the case to make any determinations regarding plaintiff's litigation capabilities. See Pickett v. Chicago Transit Aut., 930 F.3d 869, 871 (7th Cir. 2019); Romanelli v. Suliene, 615 F.3d 847, 852 (7th Cir. 2010). [See STATEMENT] Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 12/10/2020. Mailed notice(jp, )
|
| MAILED copy of order dated 12/10/2020, an amended complaint form and instructions to Israel Ruiz. (jp, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for a 60 day additional time to verify that Plaintiff has already paid the $400 filing fee in this case by Plaintiff Israel Ruiz. (Exhibits). (jn, ) Modified on 12/9/2020 (jn, ). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 11/5/2020: Plaintiff has submitted a complaint #1 but did not prepay the filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By December 7, 2020, plaintiff must either: (1) submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that includes the documentation and certification described below; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. If he does not comply, the court will summarily dismiss this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a copy of this order. Mailed notice(sb, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by Israel Ruiz. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Israel Ruiz for attorney representation. (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Israel Ruiz; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
