Williams v. Saul
Plaintiff: Marie Williams
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv50490
Filed: December 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Lisa A Jensen
Referring Judge: Philip G Reinhard
2 Judge: Margaret J Schneider
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: The parties are notified that prior to her appointment as magistrate judge, Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Schneider was the supervising attorney in the United States Attorney's Office, Western Division. In her capacity as supervising attorney, Judge Schneider supervised the attorneys handling all appeals from the Social Security Administration in the Western Division. However, Judge Schneider took no part in any substantive work on these matters and made no decisions or recommendations on how the cases should proceed. Mailed notice. (jxk)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: General Order 21-0004: It appearing that Margaret J. Schneider has been appointed as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division; and It further appearing that under the general provisions of Internal Operating Procedure 17 provides for the creation of the initial calendar for a newly appointed magistrate judge by equalization; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of civil consent cases and civil referral cases shall be reassigned to form the initial calendar of the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Local Rule 72.1 that Magistrate Judge Schneider is to become the designated magistrate judge in any pending civil case where former Magistrate Judge Johnston was the designated magistrate judge; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that unless otherwise ordered by Magistrate Judge Schneider, all hearing dates, deadlines, and schedules set in the attached list of cases are to remain in effect; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review Magistrate Judge Schneider's webpage on the Court's website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add Magistrate Judge Schneider the Courts' civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that she shall receive a full share of such cases; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add Magistrate Judge Schneider to the Court's criminal case assignment system in six (6) months so that Magistrate Judge Schneider shall thereafter receive a full share of such cases.. Case reassigned to the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider for all further proceedings. Honorable Lisa A. Jensen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 2/11/2021. (ec, )
February 8, 2021 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Defendant's motion for extension of time to file the administrative record #8 is agreed and granted. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 4/16/2021. Mailed notice. (jxk)
February 5, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Mallory, Monica)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Parties consent to exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. This case is transferred to Magistrate Judge Lisa A. Jensen. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 12/16/2020:electronic notice(pg, )
December 16, 2020 Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Seibold, Stephanie)
December 16, 2020 Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Monica V Mallory as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Mallory, Monica)
December 15, 2020 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marie Williams by Tracy Lynn Jones (Jones, Tracy)
December 15, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Seibold, Stephanie)
December 15, 2020 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marie Williams by Stephanie Renee Seibold (Seibold, Stephanie)
December 15, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marie Williams; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17742687.(Seibold, Stephanie)
December 15, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Monica V Mallory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marie Williams
Represented By: Tracy Lynn Jones
Represented By: Stephanie Renee Seibold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?