Kates v. Gonzalez
| Derrek Steven Kates |
| Gonzalez |
| 3:2021cv50065 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER with Statement; Petitioner's motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition #7 is granted insofar as it seeks to clarify his claims in his petition and memorandum supporting the petition. Respondent's response to the petition is due by April 16, 2021. Petitioner's reply is due May 17, 2021. See the attached order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 3/11/2021: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Petitioner Derrek Steven Kates to Supplement 2241 Petition With Ground IV and Memorandum of Fact and Law (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, )
|
|
MAILED copy of order dated 2/22/2021 to Derrek Kates. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 6
PRISONER Trust Fund Account Statement (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER; Petitioner Derrek Steven Kates, a USP Thomson inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition challenging his 2013 conviction for conspiring to distribute a controlled substance. Kates, however, has neither paid the $5.00 filing fee nor submitted an in forma pauperis (IFP) application demonstrating his inability to pay it. His motion for the recruitment of counsel states he was including an IFP application; however, none was received. By March 31, 2021, he must either pay the $5.00 fee by check or money order made payable to the Clerk, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, or submit a completed IFP application. The Court directs the Clerk to forward to Kates an IFP form. Kates' failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. See N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.3(f). Kates' motion for the recruitment of counsel #4 is denied without prejudice as he has not yet demonstrated his indigency and his current pleadings indicate an attorney is unnecessary at this time. See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. 2254 Cases. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 2/22/2021: Mailed notice(yxp, )
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Petitioner Derrek Steven Kates for attorney representation. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM of Fact and Law. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, )
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus by Derrek Steven Kates against Gonzalez (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kates v. Gonzalez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Derrek Steven Kates | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Gonzalez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
