Doctor v. Thomson USP Illinois
| Kareem A. Doctor and Kareem Antwan Doctor |
| Thomson USP illinois |
| 3:2021cv50117 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Rockford Office |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
Letter/Citations by Kareem A. Doctor (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 1/17/23)(pg, )
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER Petitioner has submitted a letter #23 to this Court that, without context, contains citations to various Supreme Court cases. None of the cases relate to Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition, which this Court denied on October 18, 2022 #19 , and the letter contains no explanation as to their significance nor asserts what relief, if any, Petitioner may be seeking. Attached to the letter is a copy of the Court's judgment #20 that was entered upon the denial of his 2241 petition. The judgment contains various annotations that appear to have been made by Petitioner. To the extent Petitioner's letter can be construed as a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment, his motion is denied. A Rule 60(b) motion may be granted only for: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud or misconduct by the opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; and (6) any other reason that justifies relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). "Relief under Rule 60(b)(6) requires a showing of extraordinary circumstances justifying the reopening of a final judgment." Arrieta v. Battaglia, 461 F.3d 861, 865 (7th Cir. 2006). Petitioner's letter provides no basis for granting relief under Rule 60(b). This case remains closed. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 12/14/2022: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
|
Filing 23
LETTER from Kareem A. Doctor dated 12/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jp, )
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER; On October 18, 2022, the Clerk's Office mailed to Petitioner a copy of the opinion #19 and judgment #20 that were entered in his case. The documents were mailed to USP Thomson, Petitioner's address of record on the docket. The U.S. Postal Service returned these documents as undeliverable #21 . The Clerk's Office is not required to track down litigants. It is the responsibility of Petitioner to maintain a current address with the Court. Nevertheless, the Bureau of Prisons' records indicate that Petitioner has been transferred to USP Coleman II. The Clerk will resend the documents to Petitioner at his current address, but Petitioner is instructed that he must advise the Court of any subsequent address changes by promptly filing a Notice of Change of Address form. Petitioner is further reminded to consult pages 16 and 17 of the Court's opinion #19 for his appellate rights. See also Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). The Clerk is instructed to: (1) update Petitioner's address to USP Coleman II, U.S. Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1034, Coleman, Florida 33521; and (2) resend to Petitioner copies of the October 18, 2022 opinion #19 and judgment #20 . Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 11/28/2022: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
|
MAILED Copy of order #22, order #19 and doc #20 to Kareem A. Doctor at USP Coleman II. (yxp, )
|
|
Filing 21
MAIL RETURNED, for documents 19 and 20 # sent to Kareem A. Doctor returned as undeliverable, return to sender. No new contact information received. (Attachments: #1 Documents 19 And 20) (pg, )
|
|
Filing 20
ENTERED JUDGMENT on 10/18/2022. Mailed notice (jp, )
|
|
Filing 19
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Petitioner's 2241 petition (Dkt. 1) is denied. Any other pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is instructed to enter a Rule 58 judgment in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner. Civil Case Terminated. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 10/18/2022. Mailed notice (jp, )
|
|
Filing 18
SEALED DOCUMENT by Respondent Thomson USP Illinois Doctor's Presentence Investigation Report (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Murphy, Madeleine)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE by Thomson USP Illinoisin Opposition to PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by against #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Murphy, Madeleine)
|
|
Filing 16
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: On 3/18/2021 the Court gave the government to 4/30/2021 to file its response to Mr. Doctor's 2241 petition. The government did not respond by that deadline. On 7/15/2021 the Court sua sponte extended the deadline to 8/11/2021. The government has now filed a motion to extend the deadline further, to 9/10/2021. Dkt. 15. The government's motion for an extension of time #15 is granted and its response brief is now due 9/10/2021. This extension is final. The respondent's reply brief is now due 10/13/2021. In light of the substitution of counsel #14 , the Clerk is directed to terminate the appearance of attorney Jessica Maveus. Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION by Petitioner Kareem A. Doctor for extension of time (Murphy, Madeleine)
|
|
Filing 14
WITHDRAWING Jessica S. Maveus as counsel for Respondent Thomson USP Illinois and substituting Madeleine Sullivan Murphy as counsel of record (Murphy, Madeleine)
|
|
Filing 13
DESIGNATION of Jessica S. Maveus as U.S. Attorney for Respondent Thomson USP Illinois (Maveus, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: On 3/18/2021 the Court set a briefing schedule on Mr. Doctor's habeas petition. See Dkt. 11. To date, the government has not filed its response brief, which was due 4/30/2021. The deadline for the government's response is reset to 8/11/2021 and the petitioner's reply brief is now due 9/10/2021. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this minute entry to the U.S. Attorney's office in Rockford. Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER with Statement; Respondent is directed to respond to Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition by April 30, 2021. Petitioner's reply is due June 1, 2021. See the attached order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 3/18/2021: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
|
Filing 10
MAILED Prisoner Local Rule 83.15 Letter to all parties of record (bg, )
|
|
Filing 9
RECEIVED from South Carolina; Case Number 1:21-cv-00537 (bg)
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION & ORDER adopting the #4 Report and Recommendation, transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and denying a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr on 3/15/2021. (lbak) [Transferred from South Carolina on 3/15/2021.]
|
|
Filing 5
***DOCUMENT MAILED #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Kareem A. Doctor, 20597171, Thomson AUSP, PO Box 1002, Thomson, IL 61285. (lbak) [Transferred from South Carolina on 3/15/2021.]
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Objections to R&R due by 3/8/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/22/2021. (lbak) [Transferred from South Carolina on 3/15/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (lbak) [Transferred from South Carolina on 3/15/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kareem A. Doctor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lbak) [Transferred from South Carolina on 3/15/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
