Benedict v. Saul
| Colleen K. Benedict |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 3:2021cv50238 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #8 , is granted. Defendant has until 10/15/21 to respond to the complaint and file the electronic certified administrative record. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Brady, Jana) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Waiver of Local Rule 83.15 #3 , is granted. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The above-captioned case is currently pending on my calendar. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be reassigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Schneider pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment as indicated below. [See attached] Case referred to the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Signed by Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 6/22/2021. (jp, )
|
| Filing 5 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Jana L Brady as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Brady, Jana) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Colleen K. Benedict For Waiver of Local Rule 83.15 (UNOPPOSED) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Richter, Matthew) |
| MAILED Local Rule 83.15 to Counsel for plaintiff. (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Colleen K. Benedict by Matthew Frederick Richter (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Colleen K. Benedict; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18358012. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Benedict v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Jana L Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Colleen K. Benedict | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Frederick Richter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
