Fickas v. Saul
Plaintiff: Kimberly L. Fickas
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2021cv50262
Filed: July 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Lisa A Jensen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Defendant's motion for extension of time to file the administrative record #8 is unopposed and granted. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 11/1/2021. Mailed notice. (vk)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Andrew M. Saul for extension of time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Brady, Jana)
July 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Plaintiff's motion for waiver of Local Rule 83.15 #6 is unopposed and granted. The Court waives the requirement for Plaintiff's counsel to designate local counsel in this case, unless otherwise ordered. Mailed notice. (vk)
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Kimberly L. Fickas For Waiver of Local Rule 83.15 (UNOPPOSED) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Richter, Matthew)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order MAILED Local Rule 83.15 to Counsel for plaintiff. (jp, )
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Parties consent to exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. This case is transferred to Magistrate Judge Lisa A. Jensen. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 7/2/2021:electronic notice(pg, )
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Richter, Matthew)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Jana L Brady as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Brady, Jana)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kimberly L. Fickas by Matthew Frederick Richter (Richter, Matthew)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, in his capacity as COMM'R of Social Security filed by Kimberly L. Fickas; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18416670. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fickas v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly L. Fickas
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Jana L Brady
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?