Cole v. Hanley
| Lamont Antonio Cole |
| J. Hanley |
| 3:2021cv50313 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Philip G Reinhard |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 9/27/2021: Electronic notice/mailed paper notice to plaintiff. (sb, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/27/2021: The docket reflects that plaintiff paid the $402 statutory filing fee associated with this action. Accordingly, the court turns to its initial screening review of plaintiff's complaint #1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Plaintiff's motion asking for leave to file the complaint #3 is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, without prejudice to plaintiff seeking appropriate relief in state court. Final judgement shall enter. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 and any other pending motions are denied as moot. Civil case terminated. Electronic notice/mailed paper notice to plaintiff. (sb, )
|
| Paid Filing Fee Of $402.00 on 8/31/2021. #46243006474 (pg, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 8/16/2021: The court denies plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 because Plaintiff is not indigent. By September 21, 2021, plaintiff must pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. If he fails to do so by the date specified, the court will summarily dismiss this case. The court defers initial review of plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A or any other pending motions or requests until after he has paid the filing fee. Electronic/mailed paper notice to plaintiff (sb, ).
|
| Filing 7 LETTER from Lamont Antonio Cole dated 8/2/2021. (jp, ) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Lamont Antonio Cole. (jp, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Lamont Antonio Cole for attorney representation. (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Lamont Antonio Cole for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Defendant Lamont Antonio Cole For Leave to File Complaint. (jp, ) Modified on 8/9/2021 (jp, ). |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Lamont Antonio Cole; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Notice of Filing, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Summons and Waiver, #8 Envelope) (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cole v. Hanley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamont Antonio Cole | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J. Hanley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
