Chelberg v. Nova Wildcat Shur-Line, LLC
| Saige Chelberg |
| Nova Wildcat Shur-Line, LLC |
| 3:2021cv50314 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Philip G Reinhard |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: The parties' stipulation for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond #9 is construed as a motion, and it is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 10/25/2021. The initial status report date of 10/8/2021 is stricken and reset to 10/27/2021. Mailed notice. (vk) |
| Filing 10 Western Division ADR Notification (jp, ) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Harwath, Amy) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Nova Wildcat Shur-Line, LLC by Amy I. Harwath (Harwath, Amy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saige Chelberg as to Nova Wildcat Shur-Line, LLC on 8/10/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. (Levin, David) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: The parties shall jointly complete the PDF fillable initial status report form found on Judge Jensen's webpage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Initial Status Conferences and Reports and file by 10/8/2021. Plaintiff is directed to notify any party filing an appearance to the entry of this order. Mailed notice. (vk) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Nova Wildcat Shur-Line, LLC (jmk, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Saige Chelberg by Andrew Aaron Brashler (Brashler, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Saige Chelberg by Todd M Friedman (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Saige Chelberg by David B. Levin (Levin, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Saige Chelberg; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18542225. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Levin, David) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chelberg v. Nova Wildcat Shur-Line, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Saige Chelberg | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Aaron Brashler |
| Represented By: | Todd M Friedman |
| Represented By: | David B. Levin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nova Wildcat Shur-Line, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Amy I. Harwath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
