Hunt v. Ciolli et al
| Maurice Hunt |
| A. Ciolli, J. Hess, J. Leonowicz, FNU Smiddy, Dr. K., Dugdale, M. Winkler, FNU Gaston, A. Drinkall and C. Bumgard |
| 3:2021cv50459 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Philip G Reinhard |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Maurice Hunt to This Court's Order Dated 1/4/2022 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, ) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Maurice Hunt for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 1/4/2022: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. By February 11, 2022, plaintiff must submit either a properly completed application or a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, explaining what steps he has taken to obtain a completed application, including when and with whom he discussed his requests. Alternatively, plaintiff may pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee. Additionally, plaintiff must submit a declaration, again under penalty of perjury, explaining why he contends that the "imminent danger" exception to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) applies to his complaints of mistreatment and excessive force by officers that occurred months prior to the filing of this complaint. The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this order and a blank in forma pauperis application. The Clerk also is directed to send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at USP Thomson, who is requested to comply with plaintiff's reasonable requests for information to complete his in forma pauperis application, consistent with prison policies. Plaintiff's failure to fully comply with this order by the date set forth above will result in summary dismissal of this lawsuit. Electronic notice/mailed a copy of the order and an IFP form to plaintiff and a copy of the order to the Trust Fund officer at Thomson. (sb, )
|
| Filing 4 LETTER from Maurice Hunt dated 12/3/2021. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Maurice Hunt for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Maurice Hunt; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jp, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Maurice Hunt. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
