Parks v. Wilks et al
| Daniel Lee Parks |
| Justin Wilks, Kemeron, Brandon Eisenberg, Stevens, Murzano, Alan, Jacobs and Dalke |
| 3:2022cv50018 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER; Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 and motion for service at government expense #6 is granted. His motion for attorney representation #7 , motion for protective order #9 , motion for attorney representation #10 , and motion for preliminary injunction #11 are denied. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an amended complaint form and instructions, along with a copy of this order. See the attached Order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 3/15/2022:Mailed notice(yxp, )
|
| MAILED Copy of order #15 and amended complaint form to Daniel Lee Parks. (yxp, ) |
| Filing 14 Notice To Court: Major Kemmeron by Daniel Lee Parks (pg, ) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT To Court by Daniel Lee Parks (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 12 RECEIVED AMENDED Complaint and 0 copies by Daniel Lee Parks (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks for preliminary injunction, MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks for temporary restraining order (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Declaration, #3 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks for attorney representation (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks For Immediate Order of Protection (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jp, ) |
| Filing 8 LETTER from Daniel Lee Parks dated 1/23/22. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks for attorney representation (pg, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks For Service Of Process At Government Expense (pg, ) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks (pg, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Daniel Lee Parks dated 12/9/21. (pg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Daniel Lee Parks (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| MAILED Clerks Notice along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Daniel Lee Parks. (jp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
