Brown v. Deere & Co.
| Daniel Brown Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Ostego Forestry Services |
| Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere |
| 3:2022cv50039 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Philip G Reinhard |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Western Division ADR Notification (jp, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Defendant's motion to stay pending a decision on consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation #11 is granted as unopposed. The parties are ordered to file a status report as soon as the JPML issues its decision. (yxp, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Deere & Co. (Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Deere & Co. to stay (Unopposed) (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Deere's Motion for Stay Pending JPML Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer)(Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Deere & Co. by Amanda Balos Maslar (Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: In light of the motion to consolidate filed with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the parties are ordered to file a joint status report by March 25, 2022, regarding whether this case should be stayed pending a decision on whether to consolidate. (yxp, ) |
| MAILED Local Rule 83.16 to Amanda Maslar. (jp, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Deere & Co. of Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Proceedings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Deere's Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Proceedings)(Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Deere & Co. of Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Proceedings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Proceedings)(Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: The parties shall jointly complete the PDF fillable initial status report form found on Judge Jensen's webpage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Initial Status Conferences and Reports and file by 4/8/2022. Plaintiff is directed to notify any party filing an appearance to the entry of this order. Mailed notice. (vk) |
| Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign the above-captioned case as to Judge Iain D. Johnston in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 294 (b). Signed by Executive Committee on 2/15/2022. (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard: Judge Reinhard recuses himself from this case as he is exercising his authority not to take the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 294(b). Therefore, the court recommends to the Executive Committee that this case be reassigned to Judge Iain D. Johnston for all further matters. Electronic notice (sb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daniel Brown by Timothy Jackson (Jackson, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daniel Brown by Edward A. Wallace (Wallace, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Daniel Brown; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19149062. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wallace, Edward) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Deere & Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Brown Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Ostego Forestry Services | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Jackson |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wallace |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Balos Maslar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
