Spiker v. Erskines et al
| Robert E. Spiker and Melissa A. Spiker |
| Robert E. Erskines, Six Unknown U.S.P. Thomson Officers, D. Gonzales, Jr., A. Ciolli, V. Garcia and C. Horst |
| 3:2022cv50053 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for writ to be placed in protective custody of U.S. Marshal Office (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for summary judgment (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 11 RECEIVED AMENDED Complaint and 0 copies by Robert E. Spiker (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for court order directed at the defendant's to produce electronic recordings for discovery (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for attorney representation (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker to order on motion to amend/correct, order on motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, #5 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for permanent injunction, MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for temporary injunction, MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for attorney representation (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER; Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to pursue this lawsuit, she must, by April 8, 2022, either (1) pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee, or (2) seek leave to pay the filing fee in installments by submitting a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint #3 is denied. If she wants to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must, in addition to satisfying the filing-fee requirements: (1) submit an amended complaint containing all claims and Defendants, and properly disclosing her litigation history; and (2) show cause (explain in writing) under penalty of perjury as to why she should not be sanctioned, up to and including dismissal of this case with prejudice, for failure to accurately disclose her litigation history in her original complaint. Failure to fully comply with this order by the date set forth above will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank amended complaint form, a blank in forma pauperis application (prisoner version), and a copy of this order. See the attached Order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 3/10/2022: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
| MAILED Copy of Order #5, amended complaint form and in forma pauperis application to Plaintiff Spiker via USPS. (yxp, ) |
| MAILED Clerks Notice along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker. (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Robert E. Spiker to amend received complaint #1 (pg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Robert E. Spiker (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(pg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
