Knautz v. Walmart Inc.
| Amber Knautz |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 3:2022cv50236 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amber Knautz by Francis Richard Greene (Greene, Francis) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: Motion to Withdraw #6 , is granted. The Clerk is directed to terminate the appearances of Attorneys Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle from the docket. Plaintiff has until 08/17/22 for new local counsel to enter an appearance. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Attorney Peter Lubin, Patrick Austermuehle to withdraw as attorney for Amber Knautz. No party information provided (LUBIN, PETER) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amber Knautz by Patrick Doyle Austermuehle (Austermuehle, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amber Knautz by PETER S. LUBIN (LUBIN, PETER) |
| MAILED Local Rule 83.15 to counsel for plaintiff. (jp, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Walmart Inc. (ak, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amber Knautz by Spencer Sheehan (Sheehan, Spencer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sheehan, Spencer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Amber Knautz; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19616316.(Sheehan, Spencer) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Knautz v. Walmart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amber Knautz | |
| Represented By: | Spencer Sheehan |
| Represented By: | Francis Richard Greene |
| Represented By: | PETER S. LUBIN |
| Represented By: | Patrick Doyle Austermuehle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
