Young v. Schmidt
Plaintiff: Demetrius Jason Young
Defendant: Officer Schmidt
Case Number: 3:2022cv50267
Filed: August 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Lisa A Jensen
Referring Judge: Philip G Reinhard
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2022 Filing 6 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 9/22/2022. Mailed by jcc (jp, )
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER : The court denied plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered him to pay the filing fee by September 6, 2022 #4 . At that time, the court warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in summary dismissal of his case. To date, the court has not received plaintiff's payment of the filing fee, and so, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate all pending motions as moot. Case closed. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/22/2022. Mailed by jcc (jp, )
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER : Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. If plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must pay the $402 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order by September 6, 2022, will result in summary dismissal of this case. [See STATEMENT] Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 8/2/2022. Mailed notice (jp, )
August 1, 2022 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Demetrius Jason Young for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, )
August 1, 2022 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, )
August 1, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Demetrius Jason Young (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, )
August 1, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, )
August 1, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, )
August 1, 2022 MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Demetrius Jason Young. (jp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Demetrius Jason Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?