Wigginton v. City Of Belvidere et al
| Richard Wigginton |
| City Of Belvidere, County Of Boone, State Of Illinois, Kwame Raoul, Tricia Smith, Robin Babcox-Poole, Karla Maville and Ryan Swift |
| 3:2022cv50292 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Philip G Reinhard |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 PETITION For Status and Determination on Amended Petition for Waiver and Fees and Motion for Legal Representation. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED APPLICATION by Plaintiff Richard Wigginton for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jxk) |
| Filing 7 RECEIVED Amended Complaint and 1 copies filed by Richard Wigginton. (jxk) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff, Richard Wigginton, pro se brings this action against defendants, City of Belvidere, County of Boone, the State of Illinois and its Attorney General, the Boone County States Attorney, two Boone County assistant states attorneys, and a state associate circuit court judge. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin his prosecution in the state court under certain state statutes. He contends that his prosecution under these statutes violates the United States Constitution and federal law. Plaintiff has applied to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") #4 . Plaintiff's IFP application discloses he owns a home which was appraised in June 2022 at a value of $267,000 and has an outstanding mortgage balance of $150,000. Based on this information, plaintiff has equity in his home in excess of $100,000. Based on the substantial equity that appears to exist in plaintiff's real estate, the court finds plaintiff has not shown that he is unable to pay the filing fee or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Therefore, plaintiff's application to proceed IFP is denied. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $402 within 30 days of the entry of this order or this case will be dismissed.1 Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is held in abeyance pending payment of the filing fee. Signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 8/30/2022:Notice mailed by judicial staff (pg, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Richard Wigginton for attorney representation (pg, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Richard Wigginton for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Richard Wigginton (pg, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 8 copies by Richard Wigginton (pg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment.(pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
