Brown v. Mitchell et al
| Learnell L. Brown |
| David Mitchell, Tarry Williams and Doe |
| 3:2022cv50295 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Margaret J Schneider |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Correction as to #9 . (jp, ) |
| Filing 9 ENTERED IN ERROR. Motion forwarded to USDC Southern Illinois. Modified on 9/22/2022 (jp, ). |
| ELECTRONIC ACKNOWLEDGMENT Case transferred from Illinois Northern has been opened in Southern District of Illinois as case 3:22-cv-02193, filed 09/20/2022. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 8 TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Illinois the electronic record. (jp, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER; The Clerk is also directed to transfer this action forthwith to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis Division, for review of Plaintiff's initial pleadings and any other action deemed appropriate. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 9/19/2022: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (jp, ) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Learnell L. Brown for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER; Plaintiff has submitted a complaint #1 but did not prepay the filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By September 29, 2022, Plaintiff must either: (1) submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that includes the documentation and certification described below; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. If he does not comply, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a copy of this order. See the attached order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 8/29/2022: Mailed notice (yxp, )
|
| MAILED Copy of order #5 and IFP form to Learnell Brown (yxp, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Learnell L. Brown For Service of Process at Government Expense. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Learnell L. Brown for attorney representation. (jp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Learnell L. Brown; (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (jp, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Learnell L. Brown. (jp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
