Scott v. Ford Motor Company
Ryan Scott |
Ford Motor Company |
3:2022cv50352 |
October 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Iain D Johnston |
Margaret J Schneider |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from Illinois Northern has been opened in Eastern District of Michigan as case 2:23-cv-10653, filed 03/21/2023. (jp, ) |
Filing 25 TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Michigan the electronic record. (jp, ) |
Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Before the Court is the defendant's motion to transfer venue to the Eastern District of Michigan under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). Dkt. 11. The plaintiff initially opposed transfer, see Dkt. 16, but now joins in the request to transfer, see Dkt. 23. In light of the parties' request, and the fact that other cases raising the same issues raised in this case are reportedly already pending in the Eastern District of Michigan, see Dkt. 22, the Court finds under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) that the interests of justice will be served and grants the defendant's motion to transfer #11 . The clerk is directed to transfer this case forthwith to the Eastern District of Michigan. Civil case terminated. (yxp, ) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (jp, ) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Ryan Scott to motion to transfer case #11 - Plaintiff's Notice of Withdrawal of Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue (Fegan, Elizabeth) |
Filing 22 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Supplemental Authority (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order granting transfer to EDMI)(Boyle, Mark) |
Filing 21 REPLY by Defendant Ford Motor Company to motion to transfer case #11 in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue (Boyle, Mark) |
Filing 20 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Ford Motor Company (Boyle, Mark) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE by Ryan Scottin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Ford Motor Company to transfer case Motion to Transfer Venue #11 (Lindenfeld, Jonathan) |
Filing 18 ORDER: Defendant Ford Motor Company's motion for extension of time #14 , taken by the Court as a motion to stay the proceedings, is granted. See attached order for details. Signed by the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider on 1/3/2023. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
Filing 17 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE by Ryan Scottin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Ford Motor Company for extension of time to file response/reply #14 (Fegan, Elizabeth) |
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: As to Defendant's motion for extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint #14 , Plaintiff has until 12/15/2022 to file a response. Defendant's deadline to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is stayed pending the Court's ruling on Defendant's motion. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Defendant Ford Motor Company for extension of time to file response/reply (Boyle, Mark) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: As to Defendant's motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) #11 , Plaintiff has until 01/03/23 to respond. Defendant has until 01/17/23 to reply. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
Filing 12 Western Division ADR Notification (jp, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Ford Motor Company to transfer case Motion to Transfer Venue (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Boyle, Mark) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Mark Howard Boyle Appearance (Boyle, Mark) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ryan Scott by Jonathan David Lindenfeld (Lindenfeld, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: Attorney Jonathan D. Lindenfeld's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff #6 , is granted. Attorney Lindenfeld is directed to file his appearance on behalf of Plaintiff by 11/22/22. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ryan Scott as to Ford Motor Company on 10/28/2022, answer due 11/18/2022. (Fegan, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20052147. (Lindenfeld, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider: The Court has received and reviewed the parties' Stipulated Order on Briefing Schedule for Ford's Responsive Pleading #4 . The "stipulation" indicates Plaintiff served his complaint on Defendant; however, there is no proof on the docket of service. Additionally, while the "stipulation" notes counsel for Defendant, no counsel has entered an appearance in this case. By 12/16/22, proof of service of the complaint should be filed on the docket, counsel for Defendant should enter an appearance, and any answer or other responsive pleading should be filed by Defendant. Mailed notice. (jxk) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION STIPULATED ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR FORD'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING (Miles, Perry) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Ford Motor Company (kra, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ryan Scott by Elizabeth A. Fegan (Fegan, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Fegan, Elizabeth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ryan Scott; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BILNDC-19918240.(Fegan, Elizabeth) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scott v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ryan Scott | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth A. Fegan |
Represented By: | Jonathan David Lindenfeld |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Mark Howard Boyle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.