Hicks v. United States et al
Plaintiff: Ryan Dean Hicks
Defendant: United States, Social Security, Department of Defense and Department of Education
Case Number: 3:2022cv50451
Filed: December 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Iain D Johnston
Referring Judge: Margaret J Schneider
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2023 Filing 11 ENTERED JUDGMENT, Civil case terminated. (yxp, )
February 22, 2023 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: On 1/3/2023 the Court issued a rule to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), (h). Dkt. 7. The response was originally due 1/24/2023 and the Court warned that failure to respond may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Id. The Court then granted Mr. Hicks' motion for an extension of time and reset the deadline to 2/16/2023, see Dkt. 9, but as of the issuance of this minute entry, Mr. Hicks has not responded to the rule to show cause. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The pending motions to proceed in forma pauperis #3 and for counsel #4 are stricken. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and terminate this civil case. (yxp, )
January 20, 2023 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: The plaintiff's motion for an extension of time #8 is granted. His response to the rule to show cause is now due 2/16/2023. Mailed notice. (yxp, )
January 19, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Ryan Dean Hicks for extension of time (pg, )
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER to Show Cause; The Court issues a rule to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), (h). Mr. Hicks shall respond to the rule to show cause by 1/24/2023. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). His motions to proceed in forma pauperis #3 and for counsel #4 remain under advisement. See the attached Order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 1/3/2023:Mailed notice(yxp, )
December 29, 2022 Filing 6 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
December 28, 2022 Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Ryan Dean Hicks. (jp, )
December 28, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Ryan Dean Hicks for attorney representation. (jp, )
December 28, 2022 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ryan Dean Hicks for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jp, )
December 28, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jp, )
December 28, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Ryan Dean Hicks; (Attachments: #1 Petition) (jp, )
December 28, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, )
December 28, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Margaret J. Schneider. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. United States et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Dean Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?