Stoll v. Steel River Systems, LLC
Beverly G. Stoll |
Steel River Systems, LLC |
3:2023cv50017 |
January 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Lisa A Jensen |
Iain D Johnston |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: The plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). DKt. 6. The defendant has not yet answered or moved for summary judgment. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. (yxp, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Beverly G. Stoll (Strauss, Samuel) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Steel River Systems, LLC (kra, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER to Show Cause: The Court issues a Rule to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of Article III standing. The plaintiff shall respond to this Rule to Show Cause by 2/2/2023. Alternatively, if by that date the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this case and refiles in state court, then the dismissal here will be without prejudice. See the attached Order for details. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 1/12/2023: (yxp, ) |
Filing 4 INTRA district transfer from the Eastern Division 23cv151. (jp, ) |
Filing 3 DIVISIONAL TRANSFER Notice. Case transferred to Western Division - Rockford. (daj, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Strauss, Samuel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Beverly G. Stoll; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20224672.(Strauss, Samuel) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jp, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stoll v. Steel River Systems, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Beverly G. Stoll | |
Represented By: | Samuel J. Strauss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Steel River Systems, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.